|
Marc Canter
raises
what many in the community have been saying for a long time, but what the
OpenID Foundation seems
to have a hard time wrapping its collective minds around:
... OpenID can actually solve ... [many] issues - by embracing
other complementary technologies (like oAuth, OpenSocial,
Portable Contacts, microformats, FOAF and RSS/Atom) to create a
wrapper solution oriented approach - focused on simplifying the
whole ID conundrum for end-users. Barriers of entry, usability
issues and confusing messages can all be solved by OpenID
positioning itself as a single point-of-contact solution.
He follows up
the next day saying:
Open Stack is a little too general. I use the term open mesh - on purpose
- cause I don't WANT it to be specific. Open Mesh has to represent the
combination of a bunch of different stacks; some open, some semi-open, whatever.
But OpenID sure is a great term - and it could certainly be morphed into
THE brand.
This is what we need right now - a single entry point into solving the
ID conundrum. ID is hard and asking end-users to keep track of the
difference between Single Sign-On, authenticaton, reliable parties, claims,
trust, security, privacy, data portability and persona - is just not
gonna happen.
...
Without that - and we'll be stuck catering to geeks and nerds like us
- forever.
That last sentence is one that I've been re-iterating to anybody who'd
listen in OpenID land for too many months now, or so it feels. Branding
is at the very top of that list, and I completely agree that the brand has
to bigger than a little protocol (and thus confuse the user with
some many more little brands of other little protocols).
The question is: do the movers and shakers in this community have the
courage to put the petty turf wars over being the biggest fish in a tiny
pond aside, merge the ponds and actually create something, together,
that is big enough to truly matter?
Says Marc:
Or as Rodney King said so eloquently "why can't we all work together?"
And I might add: and perhaps accomplish something that actually matters
in the real world?
|